Molar root canal treatment performed by undergraduate dental students; an observational study of procedural errors and student perception.

BACKGROUND: Molar root canal treatment (RCT) is challenging and requires training and specific skills. Rotary instrumentation (RI) reduces the time needed for instrumentation but may increase the risk of certain procedural errors. The aims of this study were to evaluate the quality of molar RCTs provided by undergraduate students, to compare the prevalence of procedural errors following manual and RI, and to assess the students' self-perceived confidence to perform molar RCT without supervision and their preference for either manual or RI. METHODS: Molar RCTs performed by the final year students were evaluated radiographically according to predefined criteria (Appendix 1). The procedural errors, treatment details, and the students' self-perceived confidence to perform molar RCT and their preference for either manual or RI were recorded. Descriptive statistics were performed, and the Chi-squared test was used to detect any statistically significant differences. RESULTS: 60.4% of RCTs were insufficient. RI resulted in more sufficient treatments compared with MI (49% vs. 30.3% respectively. X2: 7.39, p = 0.007), required fewer visits to complete (2.9 vs. 4.6 respectively. X2: 67.23, p < 0.001) and was the preferred technique by 93.1% of students. The most common procedural errors were underextension of the root canal obturation (48.4%), insufficient obturation (45.5%), and improper coronal seal (35.2%) without a significant difference between the two techniques. 26.4% of the participating students reported that they did not feel confident to perform molar RCT without supervision. CONCLUSION: The quality of molar RCT provided by UG students was generally insufficient. RI partially improved the technical quality of RCT compared with MI. UG students need further endodontic training and experience before they can safely and confidently practise molar RCT.

Limas rotatorias de uso en Odontopediatría: revisión de la literatura / Rotary files for use in pediatric dentistry: Literature review

Introducción: Los dientes primarios juegan un importante papel en el crecimiento y desarrollo general de los niños, por lo que es necesario conservarlos hasta el momento de su recambio fisiológico. Cuando existe una afectación pulpar que compromete la vitalidad del diente, la pulpectomía se convierte en un reto para el odontopediatra debido a la compleja anatomía radicular de los dientes primarios. En esta revisión bibliográfica se darán a conocer diferentes sistemas de limas usados en odontopediatría, y así brindar una mirada actualizada de la instrumentación rotatoria al realizar pulpectomías en los molares primarios. Material y Método: se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en Pubmed y Web of Science de acuerdo con criterios de inclusión y exclusión previamente establecidos. Resultados: tras aplicar los criterios de inclusión y exclusión fueron seleccionados un total de 30 referencias bibliográficas de los últimos 15 años. Conclusión: las limas rotatorias pediátricas pueden considerarse alternativas seguras y más eficientes en la realización de pulpectomías en molares primarios, ya que se reduce el tiempo de tratamiento, se produce desbridamiento completo de los conductos y se mantiene la función del diente hasta su exfoliación. (AU)

Introduction: Primary teeth play an important role in the growth and development of children, so it is necessary to keep them until the moment of their physiological replacement. When there is a pulp involvement that compromises the vitality of the tooth, pulpectomy treatment becomes a challenge for the pediatric dentist due to the complex root anatomy of primary teeth. This review of the literature will present different file systems used in primary teeth and provide an updated look at rotary instrumentation when performing pulpectomies on primary molars. Material and Method: a bibliographic search was carried out in Pubmed and Web of Science according to previously established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 30 bibliographic references from the last 15 years were selected. Conclusion: pediatric rotary files can be considered safe and more efficient alternatives in performing pulpectomies on primary molars, due to treatment time is reduced, complete debridement of the root canals is produced, and tooth function is maintained until exfoliation. (AU)

Limas rotatorias de uso en Odontopediatría: revisión de la literatura / Rotary files for use in pediatric dentistry: Literature review

Introducción: Los dientes primarios juegan un importante papel en el crecimiento y desarrollo general de los niños, por lo que es necesario conservarlos hasta el momento de su recambio fisiológico. Cuando existe una afectación pulpar que compromete la vitalidad del diente, la pulpectomía se convierte en un reto para el odontopediatra debido a la compleja anatomía radicular de los dientes primarios. En esta revisión bibliográfica se darán a conocer diferentes sistemas de limas usados en odontopediatría, y así brindar una mirada actualizada de la instrumentación rotatoria al realizar pulpectomías en los molares primarios. Material y Método: se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en Pubmed y Web of Science de acuerdo con criterios de inclusión y exclusión previamente establecidos. Resultados: tras aplicar los criterios de inclusión y exclusión fueron seleccionados un total de 30 referencias bibliográficas de los últimos 15 años. Conclusión: las limas rotatorias pediátricas pueden considerarse alternativas seguras y más eficientes en la realización de pulpectomías en molares primarios, ya que se reduce el tiempo de tratamiento, se produce desbridamiento completo de los conductos y se mantiene la función del diente hasta su exfoliación. (AU)

Introduction: Primary teeth play an important role in the growth and development of children, so it is necessary to keep them until the moment of their physiological replacement. When there is a pulp involvement that compromises the vitality of the tooth, pulpectomy treatment becomes a challenge for the pediatric dentist due to the complex root anatomy of primary teeth. This review of the literature will present different file systems used in primary teeth and provide an updated look at rotary instrumentation when performing pulpectomies on primary molars. Material and Method: a bibliographic search was carried out in Pubmed and Web of Science according to previously established inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results: after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 30 bibliographic references from the last 15 years were selected. Conclusion: pediatric rotary files can be considered safe and more efficient alternatives in performing pulpectomies on primary molars, due to treatment time is reduced, complete debridement of the root canals is produced, and tooth function is maintained until exfoliation. (AU)

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Evaluation of Rotary MM Files vs Manual K Files in Primary Molars: An In Vitro Study.

AIM: Rotary instrumentation in pediatric dentistry is an emerging concept, thus this study was performed to evaluate the remaining dentine thickness (RDT), canal transportation, centering ability, quality of obturation using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and the time efficiency of rotary versus manual instrumentation in mandibular second primary molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty mandibular primary second molars (160 canals) were randomly and equally allocated to four groups. Instrumentation was done using K files in groups I and II; in each group, the obturation was done by two different obturation techniques; incremental technique and disposable syringe technique, respectively. MM rotary files (Innovative Material and Devices, Inc. [IMD], Shanghai, China) were used in groups III and IV; in each group, the obturation was done by incremental technique and disposable syringe technique. Preoperative and postoperative CBCT scans were performed and evaluated for the RDT, centering ability, canal transportation, and the canal filling quality, which was assessed as (underfill, optimal fill, and overfill). Instrumentation time was recorded for groups I and II collectively (manual instrumentation), and groups II and III collectively (rotary instrumentation). Statistical analysis was done using Chi-square, ANOVA, and post hoc Tukey tests, at p < 0.05). RESULTS: The MM rotary file removed a significantly less amount of dentine at all levels specifically at the middle section (p = 0.003). The canal transportation was significantly higher in the manual group at the cervical level (p = 0.022). In all sections, the rotary group had significantly higher values of centering ratio than the manual group (p < 0.05), which means a lower deviation of rotary instruments. For both types of files, there was no significant difference between different obturation techniques (p > 0.05). Instrumentation time was significantly lower in the rotary group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Regarding the dentine removal and the shaping ability of MM files acceptable results were obtained; however, no significant difference between the different obturation techniques. Notable time efficiency was reported in the rotary files as well. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The use of rotary files resulted in better conservation of tooth structure, better canal centering, and obturation quality as well as less canal transportation and less instrumentation time compared to manual K files.

Comparison of Cleaning Efficacy of Different Rotary Files in Primary Teeth-An In vitro Study.

Aim: The aim of the present study was to comparatively assess the cleansing efficiency of dissimilar rotary files in deciduous teeth. Materials and Methods: Forty-five deciduous anterior teeth that had been subjected to extraction were chosen for this research. The teeth were included if they had a minimum of 2/3rd undamaged root portions. Coronal entrée was completed using round diamond burs. All 45 samples were allocated at random to one of the following three groups: Group I: Control group in which the radicular canal was not subjected to any form of instrumentation, Group II: The radicular canal was subjected to instrumentation employing rotary ProTaper files, Group III: The radicular canal was subjected to instrumentation with rotary MTwo files. The samples were subjected to immersion in a succession of diluted ethyl alcohols to permit dehydration: With a change of solution every eight hours, the first 16 hours were spent in 70% alcohol, followed by eight hours in 80% alcohol, eight hours in 95% alcohol, and eight hours in 100% alcohol. The samples thus subjected to dehydration were cleared by immersion in methyl salicylate for six hours. Under a stereomicroscope with a 10x magnification, the root canals were examined by a person who was blinded to the groups in order to look for any traces of ink in the coronal, middle, and apical third of the canals. Results: In the control group, greater residual remains were present in the apical 3rd at 2.16 ± 0.08 followed by the coronal 3rd at 2.02 ± 0.14, and then in the middle 3rd at 1.88 ± 0.10. While using the ProTaper files, greater residual remains were present in the middle portion at 1.68 ± 0.16, followed by the coronal third at 0.94 ± 0.09, then the apical third at 0.98 ± 0.22. Greater residual remains were again noted with the MTwo files in the mid-portion at 1.44 ± 0.18, followed by the coronal part at 0.86 ± 0.10 and then the apical part at 0.82 ± 0.04. Differences among these groups were statistically significant with a P value < 0.001. Conclusion: The present study concluded that either of the file types used exhibited reasonably lower remnant score values in the apical third versus the middle/coronal thirds. Nonetheless, MTwo type files delineated superior capacity at removing debris versus the ProTaper file types at the apical level.

Influence of different kinematics on stationary and dynamic torsional behavior of JIZAI nickel-titanium rotary instruments: An in vitro study.

Background/purpose: Using conventional approach to examine stationary torque of nickel-titanium rotary instruments contradicts the clinical condition, and its validity for motions involving clockwise and counterclockwise rotations is questionable. This study aimed to examine the effect of different kinematics on the torsional behavior using a JIZAI instrument (#25/.04) under stationary/dynamic test conditions using clinical torque limit settings. Materials and methods: In the stationary test, the 5-mm tip of JIZAI was fixed in a cylinder-shaped vise and rotated in continuous rotation (CR) with auto-torque-reverse, optimum-torque-reverse (OTR), or reciprocation (REC) until fracture (n = 10, each). In the dynamic test, straight and severe curved canals were instrumented with JIZAI using the single-length technique with CR, OTR, or REC (n = 10, each). The stationary torque at fracture, time to fracture (Tf), dynamic torque, and screw-in force were recorded using automated-shaping-device with torque/force measuring unit. One-way ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test and Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction were used for statistical analysis (⍺ = 0.05). Results: The kinematics did not influence the stationary or dynamic torques (P > 0.05); however, did influence the screw-in force in straight canals (P < 0.05). REC had significantly longer Tf, and severe curved canals yielded significantly greater torque and screw-in force in CR (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Under the present experimental conditions, parameters other than torque showed significant effects on different kinematics. The dynamic torque and screw-in force of OTR were similar to the other rotational modes and not influenced by the canal curvature.

Exploring a Paradigm Shift in Primary Teeth Root Canal Preparation: An Ex Vivo Micro-CT Study.

Traditional hand instrumentation is a commonly used technique to perform pulpectomy in deciduous teeth by most specialists in pedodontics. Lately, dentists have embraced rotary instrumentation as a safe and effective alternative. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of root canal preparation in extracted primary molars between manual and two rotary file systems using micro-CT. Thirty-six extracted human second primary mandibular molars were divided into three groups according to the instrumentation method: (1) Manually instrumented (MI) group (n = 9) in which the teeth were treated using K-files up to size 30; (2) Kedo-Ssystem (KS) group (n = 9); (3) ProTaper Gold system (PTG) group (n = 10) and control group (n-8). Each tooth was scanned before and after the retrograde root canal preparation. Residual dentin volume was calculated using micro-CT scans to evaluate the technique's efficacy. Additionally, the preparation time and procedural errors were recorded for each tooth preparation. A one-way ANOVA test was carried out to compare the groups' dentin volume and preparation time. The mean preparation time using the manual method (13.14 min) was more than two times longer than that of the rotary techniques (4.62 min and 6.45 min). The manual preparation method using a K-file removed almost half the root canal material when compared with the rotor method (p = 0.025). Conclusion: our results suggest that rotary instrumentation is more efficient for root canal preparation in primary teeth than the traditional manual method. This finding may call for a paradigm shift in current clinical practices, where manual instrumentation is still commonly preferred.

Comparative in vitro evaluation of remaining dentine thickness following instrumentation with hand and rotary endodontic files during pulpectomy in primary molars: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The aim was to compare the remaining dentine thickness (RDT) following instrumentation with hand and rotary endodontic files during pulpectomy in primary molars. Research question was 'Is there any difference between the remaining dentine thickness following instrumentation with hand and rotary endodontic files during pulpectomy in primary molars?'. METHODS: Electronic Databases like MEDLINE PubMed, Cochrane Library, EBSCOhost, Google scholar and grey literature were searched between January 1, 2006 and August 31, 2022 for in vitro and ex vivo studies that compared hand and rotary endodontic instrumentation to evaluate the RDT in primary molars. Articles published in English or which could be translated into English were searched. Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, assessed risk of bias using the Revised, validated version of MINORS criteria. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in qualitative analysis. All included studies showed low risk of bias. Six studies showed more RDT with rotary instrumentation compared to manual instrumentation. Whereas, five studies showed variable results for RDT with manual and rotary instrumentation at different levels of root canals. One study showed no significant difference between manual and rotary instrumentation. In view of methodological heterogeneity of the findings, a meta-analysis was not conducted. CONCLUSION: High quality of evidence based on low risk of bias was found in all the included studies. Statistically, rotary instrumentation showed more RDT than manual instrumentation according to majority of studies. Despite the shortcomings of this systematic review, it is possible to infer that the use of rotary instrumentation provides more RDT and thus there is considerable conservation of tooth structure.

Dentinal Microcracks after Root Canal Preparation in Primary Root: An In Vitro Evaluation of ProTaper Gold and Kedo-S Rotary File Systems.

Context: There is a possibility of dentinal crack formation in primary teeth after root canal preparation using rotary files. Aims: To evaluate and compare the effect of ProTaper-Gold and Kedo-S rotary files on crack formation after root canal preparation in primary molars. Settings and design: A total of 120 freshly extracted mandibular primary molars (6-9 years) were randomly divided into three groups of 40 each: ProTaper-Gold, Kedo-S, and Hand H-files, respectively. Materials and methods: The roots were covered with a snuggly fitting surgical glove and stabilized in the teeth slot of a silicone mold of mandibular mixed dentition. Dental casts were obtained in a mixture of plaster of paris and sawdust. A screw system was incorporated in the cast for stabilization of the cast into the phantom head. All the root canals were instrumented in a standard operating position till 1 mm short of the radiographic apex. All roots were then stained and sectioned perpendicular to the long axis at the furcation level and 2 mm below the furcation to obtain one section per tooth. Sections were examined under a stereomicroscope at 25× magnification for any crack formations and recorded. Data were analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank and Kruskal-Wallis tests (p = 0.05). Results: The total number of cracks in terms of percentage following the use of ProTaper Gold, Kedo-S, and H-files were 35, 10, and 0%, respectively, on the upper surface and 15, 5, and 0% on the lower surface. Within the group, there was a statistically significant difference in ProTaper-Gold (p = 0.001). Conclusion: The use of ProTaper-Gold resulted in a greater number of dentinal cracks compared to Kedo-S and H-files. How to cite this article: Patil MB, Mandroli PS, Jalannavar P, et al. Dentinal Microcracks after Root Canal Preparation in Primary Root: An In Vitro Evaluation of ProTaper Gold and Kedo-S Rotary File Systems. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(5):692-697.

Treatment Outcome and Root Canal Preparation Techniques: 5-Year Follow-Up.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims at comparing treatment outcome and tooth survival of root canal-filled teeth following manual vs rotary instrumentation techniques over a 5-year period. METHODS: This was a single-centre study conducted as a follow-up to a short-term parallel-arm randomised controlled noninferiority trial in which root canal treatment was performed on teeth using either rotary or manual instrumentation. Patients were monitored at post 6-month, 1-year, 4-year, and 5-year review periods by blinded evaluators. Treatment outcome was categorised as favourable, uncertain, and unfavourable (employing European Society of Endodontology categorisation based on strict clinical and radiographic criteria), and 5-year tooth survival was determined by assessing whether tooth was in situ in the oral cavity or extracted. The Kaplan-Meier method and log rank test evaluated tooth survival. P value <.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Ninety of 120 treated teeth were assessed in 37 men and 40 women with mean age of 30.6 ± 10.99 years. Treatment outcome was significantly more favourable in the rotary group compared to the manual group at post 6-month (P = .021) and 1-year (P = .043) review periods. The differences in favourable outcome (P = .498) and tooth survival (P = .296) between the 2 groups were, however, not significant at the 5-year review period. CONCLUSIONS: The rotary instrumentation technique was shown to be more effective in resolving clinical symptoms and promoting periapical healing after the post 6-month and 1-year review compared to the manual instrumentation technique; however, both groups had similar favourable outcomes and survival rates after an extended 5-year review period.

An In Vitro Study of Gutta Percha Removal Commencing from the Root Canal Undergoing Endodontic Retreatment using Different Rotary Instrumentation Systems.

Background: In the root canal, the tenacity of microbial infection in either or both the periradicular area is the utmost communal source of endodontic failure. The majority of the gutta percha is removed using hand and rotational equipment. Aim of Study: To determine gutta percha removal by effectively utilizing three rotary instrumentation devices all through the endodontic retreatment. Objective of Study: To determine amongst the three Nickle-Titanium systems which one is significantly effective in retreatment along with comparison of retreatment efficiency using or avoiding the utilization of solvent. Materials and Methods: On 60 newly extracted, single-rooted mandibular premolars, every root canal was sealed using gutta percha and AH Plus sealer utilizing lateral compaction. After that, the samplings were separated into three investigational groups, each with 20 specimens. After that, individual groups were separated into ten specimens. After that, the groups were withdrawn with or without solvent. ProTaper retreatment files, Mtwo retreatment files, and R-Endo files were utilized to eradicate the gutta percha after two weeks. The extent of root canal filling material left in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds was recorded utilizing a stereomicroscope and a computer image processing program. The data was statistically examined using analysis of variance. Result: The ProTaper group exhibited a smaller amount of remnant filling material than the supplementary groups in the coronal and middle thirds; however a significant difference amid ProTaper and Mtwo, and Mtwo and R-Endo in the nonsolvent groups (P = 0.05) was concluded. In the nonsolvent group, the Mtwo group showed less leftover filling material. Conclusion: The elimination of root canal filling material was found to be equally effective in all systems. However, not a single experimental group could entirely eradicate gutta percha from the root canal.

Assessment of postoperative pain after single-visit root canal treatment using rotary and reciprocating file systems: an in vivo study.

Background: Various instrument kinematics used in single-visit endodontics influence the occurrence of pain after endodontic therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the occurrence of pain after mechanical instrumentation with Hyflex EDM (HEDM) and WaveOne Gold (WOG) during single-visit endodontic therapy. Methods: Sixty patients diagnosed with asymptomatic irreversible pulpitis and normal apical tissues in mandibular premolar teeth were included in the study for single-visit root canal therapy. The patients were divided into two groups (n = 30) according to the rotary instrument used during root canal preparation (group A [HEDM] and group B [WOG]). Pain was evaluated after endodontic therapy at 8, 24, and 48 h intervals using the visual analog scale (VAS). Data obtained were analyzed using the chi-square test, independent t-test, MannWhitney U test, and Wilcoxon matched-pairs test. Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups (P < 0.001) at 8, 24, and 48 h, with WOG exhibiting less pain than HEDM files. Conclusion: Postoperative pain was lower in the WOG file system than in the HEDM file system after single-visit root canal therapy at 8, 24, and 48 h.

Knowledge and Practice of Rotary Instrumentation in Primary Teeth among Saudi Arabian Dentists: A Cross-sectional Study.

Background: Making use of rotary instruments for doing pulpectomies in the primary teeth is one of the most developing areas in the field of pedodontics. The primary aim of this study was to assess the understanding and the ease with which Saudi Arabian dentists could use rotary instrumentation in primary teeth. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted among dentists over 3 months. A structured self-explanatory questionnaire was given, and responses were obtained from the dental practitioners. Results: The response rate for the survey was 92.45%. Only 21.4% of them were using rotary instruments, and ProTaper was most commonly used. The most common limitation factors that obstructed its usage included the taper and length of the existing files. On assessing the need for using an exclusive rotary file for performing root canal preparation in primary teeth, there was a significant difference observed statistically. The general thought that floated among most dental practitioners (p value = 0.01) and specialists who had 11-15 years of experience was that an exclusive rotary file is the need of the hour. Conclusion: There is an absolute need for more education programs and workshops in the country to increase the knowledge and awareness of dental practitioners, and also to give hands-on experience regarding rotary instrumentation in primary teeth. In kids, it seems appropriate to use kid-specific rotary files that make it comfortable for children too during the procedure. How to cite this article: Alowi WA, Maganur PC, Manoharan V, et al. Knowledge and Practice of Rotary Instrumentation in Primary Teeth among Saudi Arabian Dentists: A Cross-sectional Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2022;15(S-1):S97-S102.

The effect of rotary instrumentation on dentin thickness in the danger zone of the MB2 canal of maxillary first molars.

The aim of this study was to measure the initial and remaining dentin thickness in the danger zone of the second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal of maxillary first molars after rotary instrumentation using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. After determining initial dentin thickness, each sample was subjected to a standardized protocol of rotary instrumentation files: ProTaper Gold Sx Orifice Opener (maximum depth of 7 mm); Vortex Blue 15.04, 20.04, 25.04, ProTaper Gold S1, S2, F1, F2, and finally Vortex Blue 30.06. Subsequent CBCT measurements were made to compare changes in remaining dentin thickness in comparison to initial presentation. Preoperative dentin thickness in the danger zone had a mean of 0.82 ± 0.17mm. Significant levels of dentin removal in the danger zone were noted after all instrumentation groups when compared to the pre-instrumentation mean (Sx P < 0.001, 25.04 P < 0.0006, F2 P < 0.0001, 30.06 P < 0.0001). It was concluded that a thin area of dentin exists along the distal wall of the MB2 (danger zone) from the furcation to 4 mm apically.

Shaping efficiency of XP-endo shaper and Mtwo instruments in long oval root canals: A micro-CT study.

This study evaluated the shaping ability of XP-endo Shaper and Mtwo systems in long-oval-shaped canals of extracted human mandibular molars using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). Images recorded before and after preparation were evaluated for morphometric measures regarding increase in canal volume, dentin removed, surface area, untouched walls and structure model index (SMI). Data were statistically analysed using the Mann-Whitney test with 5% of significance. On both groups, the root canal preparation significantly increased all analysed parameters (P > 0.05). There was no statistical difference between XP-endo Shaper and Mtwo systems in the increase of the canal volume (30.50%-27.82%), in volume of dentin removed (2.77%-2.40%), in the increase of the canal surface area (11.30%-8.86%), in canal untouched surfaces (9.57%-8.51%) and in the SMI (2.59%-2.68%), respectively. XP-endo Shaper and Mtwo systems showed similar shaping efficiency and were not able to completely prepare the walls of long-oval-shaped canals of extracted human mandibular molars.

For pulp treatment in primary teeth, rotary canal instrumentation may be modestly time efficient, but otherwise similar to manual canal instrumentation.

ARTICLE TITLE AND BIBLIOGRAPHIC INFORMATION: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing rotary canal instrumentation techniques with manual instrumentation techniques in primary teeth. Manchanda S, Sardana D, Yiu CKY. Int Endod J. 2020;53(3):333-353. SOURCE OF FUNDING: Information not available. TYPE OF STUDY/DESIGN: Systematic review with meta-analysis of data.

Instrumentación rotatoria comparado con instrumentación manual para tratamiento endodóntico en dientes permanentes / Rotary instrumentation compared to manual instrumentation for endodontic treatment in permanent teeth

RESUMEN: Introducción: El éxito del tratamiento endodóntico requiere de la desinfección completa del sistema de canales radiculares. Convencionalmente este procedimiento se realiza a través de maniobras de instrumentación rotatoria o manual e irrigación química. Dentro de las diferentes técnicas de instrumentación, la de tipo rotatoria ha surgido como una alternativa a la instrumentación manual, cuyos beneficios en comparación a ésta aún deben ser dilucidados. Métodos: Realizamos una búsqueda en Epistemonikos, la mayor base de datos de revisiones sistemáticas en salud, la cual es mantenida mediante el cribado de múltiples fuentes de información, incluyendo MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, entre otras. Extrajimos los datos desde las revisiones identificadas, analizamos los datos de los estudios primarios, realizamos un metanálisis y preparamos una tabla de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. Resultados y conclusiones: Identificamos cinco revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyeron 15 estudios primarios, de los cuales, 10 corresponden a ensayos aleatorizados. Concluimos que el uso de instrumentación rotatoria en comparación a instrumentación manual probablemente disminuye la incidencia del dolor postoperatorio. Además, la instrumentación rotatoria podría disminuir el uso de analgésicos post tratamiento endodóntico. Sin embargo, podría resultar en poca o nula diferencia en la intensidad del dolor, pero la certeza de la evidencia es baja. Además, no es posible establecer con claridad si el uso de instrumentación rotatoria en comparación a la instrumentación manual aumenta la reparación apical debido a que la certeza de la evidencia existente ha sido evaluada como muy baja.

ABSTRACT: Introduction: Successful root canal therapy (endodontic treatment) requires complete disinfection of the root canal system. Traditionally, disinfection of the root canal system involves rotary or manual instrumentation and chemical irrigation. Various rotary instrumentation techniques have emerged as an alternative to manual instrumentation, but its benefits against manual techniques need to be clarified. Methods: We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. Results and conclusions: We identified five systematic reviews that together included 15 primary studies, of which 10 correspond to randomized trials. We conclude that the use of rotary instrumentation compared to manual instrumentation probably reduces the incidence of pain. Also, rotatory instrumentation may reduce the use of postoperative analgesics. However, it could result in little or no difference in pain intensity, but the certainty of the evidence is low. Furthermore, it is not possible to clearly establish whether the use of rotary instrumentation increases apical repair as the certainty of the evidence has been assessed as very low.

Shaping Ability of ProTaper Next, Hyflex CM, and V-Taper 2H Nickel-Titanium Files in Mandibular Molars: A Micro-computed Tomographic Study.

Introduction: Although micro-computed tomography (MCT) evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next (PTN) and Hyflex CM (HCM) files has been reported, to our knowledge, no study has assessed the performance of V-Taper 2H (VT) files. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the shaping ability of PTN, HCM, and VT systems in the mesial canals of mandibular molars using MCT. Methods and Materials: Thirty extracted first and second mandibular molars were scanned using MCT and randomly assigned to HCM, PTN, and VT groups. Images obtained before and after preparation were evaluated for the increase in the root canal volume, untouched surface area, and amount of accumulated hard tissue debris. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Kruskal-Wallis test were used to compare the variables in the groups (α=5%). Results: There were no statistically significant between-group differences in the postoperative measurements (P>0.05). The canal volume increased in all three groups: PTN (73.84%), VT (73.48%), and HCM (49.29%). The largest and smallest untouched areas were observed in the PTN (41.37%) and VT (30.85%) groups, respectively (P>0.05). The debris formed during canal preparation was 1.84%, 2.16%, and 2.42% in the VT, PTN, and HCM groups, respectively (P>0.05). Conclusions: Based on our in vitro study, the PTN, HCM, and VT systems showed similar shaping abilities. None of the tested canals were completely free from debris, while the untouched surface area was considerably large. The VT system had the most favorable results with the smallest untouched surface area and least debris were. We would recommend further trials to endorse these findings.

[Advanced research on root canal therapy for primary teeth].

Primary tooth root canal therapy is a treatment performed on primary teeth diagnosed with pulpitis or periapical periodontitis. This procedure requires perfect instrumentation, disinfection, and filling of root canals to eliminate infection, control inflammation, relieve pain, prevent pathological effects on inherited permanent tooth, and prolong primary tooth preservation. This paper reviews the research history on primary tooth root canal treatment and summarizes the progress on primary tooth root canal treatment, including anatomical morphology, root canal preparation, root canal disinfection, root canal filling, and application of antibiotics.

Effect of Optimum Torque Reverse Motion on Torque and Force Generation during Root Canal Instrumentation with Crown-down and Single-length Techniques.

INTRODUCTION: Optimum torque reverse (OTR) motion is a torque-sensitive reciprocal motion in which the motor rotates in alternating 90° counterclockwise and 180° clockwise rotation when the torque exceeds a predetermined value. This study aimed to examine whether OTR motion contributes to torque and force reduction during nickel-titanium rotary instrumentation with the crown-down or single-length technique. METHODS: Twenty-eight simulated straight canals in resin blocks were divided into 2 groups according to the type of motion (OTR or continuous rotation). The groups were further subdivided according to the preparation technique (crown-down or single-length technique, n = 7 each). Automated root canal instrumentation was performed with a torque/force analyzing device (300 rpm, up-and-down speed of 10 mm/min) and EndoWave instruments (FKG Dentaire, La-Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland) to size #25/0.06 taper. Maximum torque and apical force were recorded and analyzed with analysis of variance and the Bonferroni test. RESULTS: During the crown-down preparation phase (#35/0.08, #30/0.06, #25/0.06, and #20/0.06), OTR motion developed lower maximum torque and upward force (representing the screw-in force) than continuous rotation. During the apical preparation phase (#25/0.06), OTR motion generated significantly lower maximum clockwise and counterclockwise torque (P < .05) when the single-length technique was used and significantly lower maximum upward force regardless of the preparation technique (P < .05) compared with continuous rotation. CONCLUSIONS: Under the present experimental conditions, OTR motion reduced both torque and screw-in force during the crown-down preparation phase of the crown-down technique and during the apical preparation phase of the single-length technique.